blankblank blank


Two OpenStreetMap Data Tools

MapOSMatic – Select an area by a bounding box, or by administrative boundaries (database for the latter is currently very limited), and get a map of the area in PNG, PDF, and/or SVG format, with letter/number grid indexing:

TempeArizona

And also get a street index for that map referenced to the letter/number grid:

streetindex

OSM Extractor: Select an OSM map area by bounding box, and download georeferenced raster or vector data for that area. Vector data is available in shapefile or native XML format, but to limit its size, you have to zoom in to city level to download it. No such area limitations on raster data in GeoTiff format:

prescott

But it only saves the data in screen resolution, which limits the detail level. All data is in geographic (Plate Carree) projection, WGS84. If you have a pop-up blocker, you’ll need to set an exception for “vizure.com” so that the data download pop-up can appear.

Via SlashGeo.




US Seasonal Ingredient Map

If you’re a locavore (“one who tries to eat only locally grown foods”), you may find Epicurious’s Seasonal Ingredient Map useful. Pick any month, then click on your state, and it shows you a list of currently-available local produce:

seasonalingredients

Mouse over a produce item, and get links to produce definitions, pictures, recipes and cooking tips. Not perfect, especially for states with a wide variety of climate zones. For Arizona, it says the growing season is currently dormant, but there is fresh produce currently being grown in the warmer southwest corner of the state.

Via Lifehacker.




GIS Data For US National Parks And Monuments

The US National Park Service Data Store site offers access to GIS data for US National Parks And Monuments in a wide variety of subjects and formats, including:

  • Biology
  • Cultural Resources
  • Aerial imagery
  • Roads and trails
  • Noxious/alien plants
  • Soils
  • Land use / cover
  • Plus dozens more ….

For geology (a favorite topic of mine), there’s a related NPS Geologic Resources Inventory Publications web page listing the geology data available for most US National Parks and Monuments, including some that you wouldn’t expect it for; here’s a geology map for Abraham Lincoln’s Birthplace National Historic Site generated from the GIS data, from the summary report:

LincolnNHS

Parks can have any or all of three different types of reports: scoping summaries, geologic reports, and digital geological mapping data in GIS format. Scoping summaries and geologic reports usually have extensive references to additional information about park geology. Links to geology GIS data are “preset” links to the NPS Data Store for that information.




ScribbleMaps Goes Pro

Posted a few months ago about ScribbleMaps, a very cool web app that let you draw shapes and symbols freely in a Google Maps interface, then save the map in multiple formats:

  • JPEG
  • Print directly from browser
  • Embeddable widget (no Google Maps API key required
  • Facebook map
  • Regular Google Maps view
  • Google Earth plugin (though this didn’t work for me)
  • KML file (for viewing in Google Earth)
  • GPX (for export to your GPS)

ScribbleMaps has just added a Pro version, still in beta, that adds a host of new features:

  • You can now set up an account to save and manage maps
  • Import data in shapefile, CSV, tab-delimited, Excel spreadsheet, KML
  • Custom line styling
  • Larger color palette
  • New marker icons
  • Data layers, with full management
  • Line and polygon measurement tools
  • Object rotation tool
  • Undo/Redo
  • KML editor
  • Multiple language support

A cool tool that just got even cooler. Free for now; no mention of future cost that I could find, and I hope it stays that way.




Slow Return

Blogging will resume this week, but only with short posts. My last post on my snow delay was a week ago, and I still have one more day of snow clearing ahead of me, plus all the other stuff that’s backed up behind it. You haven’t lived until an ice dam on your roof creates a spring in the middle of your carpet. Longer posts, including the continuation of the GeoPad series, should resume next week; of course, they’re forecasting another major storm for the West Coast in about a week or so ….




Snow Job

Combine 4+ feet of snow, 2″ of rain, a car breakdown, a sick day, and one day without power, all just since Monday; the result is likely to be a low level of activity on this blog for the coming week. I’ll get back to regular posting as soon as I’m caught up.




Choosing A Laptop For A Cheap GeoPad

A GeoPad is a field-capable portable PC workstation configured for use with geographic applications (GPS/GIS); see yesterday’s post for more details. The GeoPad website has a full page on what to consider when selecting hardware, and is definitely worth a look. Much of that site is oriented around the purchase of standard field-ready laptops, none of which you could really call cheap. To put together a budget GeoPad, I concentrated on finding one that would meet as many of the following requirements as possible:

1. Relatively inexpensive; less than  $1000, preferably much less.

2. Durable. For standard laptops, 1-year laptop failure rates due to manufacturing defects run at about 10-15%, and 3-year at 15-25% under normal use (up to 31% overall after you factor in “user clumsiness”).  It’s likely that these failure rates would be greater for a laptop that gets jostled in a backpack, or used on a bumpy road. A mil-spec “rugged” PC would be the optimal choice, as it meets US military requirements for shock resistance, temperature, dust, etc.., but these are way too expensive.  A Panasonic Toughbook would be a great choice, but it’s $3000+ for even the most basic configuration. And you have to be careful about the word “rugged”, as there’s no standard definition. For example, the HP Elite 2730P calls itself rugged because it passes the military tests for temperature, dust and altitude, but not the impact/drop tests that reflect the kind of abuse it could see in the field.

3. Touch screen convertible PC. The GeoPad website emphasizes the utility of a touch screen interface for use in the field, and I totally agree. I’ve tried using my Acer Aspire One netbook in the field, with a clamshell configuration, and it just doesn’t cut it. To use it, you have to open it up, and enter data with the keyboard and mouse, something you can’t do standing up unless you have 3+ hands. A touch screen allows two-handed use at a minimum; combine it with a good working tablet case, and you can easily use it without dropping it.

Convertible means that you can use it either in standard clamshell mode, or rotate the screen and fold it down to use it in tablet mode. I wanted the option to use it in standard mode as well as tablet for added flexibility in data entry. You can get “slates”, tablets with no built-in keyboard, and then attach a keyboard via the USB connector; IMO, too clumsy and inconvenient in the field.

4. Good screen visibility in outdoor conditions. Most laptop screens don’t do well in outdoor conditions, especially in direct sunlight; the contrast gets washed out. Some rugged PCs come with special transmissive or transflective screens that will work well in outdoor conditions, but they can be very expensive. To reach my price range, I expected to have to compromise somewhat on this, but still wanted to find one that could be used under some outdoor lighting conditions.

5. Windows OS, because of the larger selection of free software available under this platform.

6. Respectable battery life; at least 4 hours under normal use.

7. Decent memory; 1 GB RAM, plus at least 30 GB storage space for software and data.

8. Light weight and compact size.

9. Plus as many typical notebook features as possible (USB ports, VGA output, wireless, Bluetooth, webcam, memory card slot, etc.)

The cost restriction narrowed down the field immediately; I couldn’t find a single “rugged” laptop available below $1000. Some standard touch screen laptops are available in that price range, in particular some of  the HP tx2 models which are just under $1000. But HP has the worst record for 1-year and 3-year failure rates in the industry (15% and 25%), and reviews have complained about the mediocre battery life. I was hopeful that some netbook touch screen convertibles might do the job, like the Asus T91 or Gigabyte 1028 series. While not “rugged” laptops, they offer a touch screen, 5-hour battery life, low weight, and fairly low cost ($500-700). But while they’re “touch screen” PCs, they have a drawback that would make them hard to work with in the field. A touch anywhere on the screen of these netbooks, even if it’s an accidental brush by your finger or palm, is registered as an input; if you’re trying to enter data on-screen, this can result in a lot of mistakes and frustration. More advanced tablet PCs get around this problem in one of two ways:

- A “digitizer” mode, where the only input recognized is that from a special stylus pen.

- “Palm rejection”, where the touch screen driver can recognize and reject minor contact from your palm or finger touches, but recognize firm contact.

So these cheap netbooks might not be a good choice because of this touch screen issue. The Hp tx2 models offer the option of being used in either basic touch screen or digitizer mode, but are much more expensive and might not be durable enough; at $1000, it seemed risky to go for this model. I almost gave up on the idea of a cheap GeoPad until, by accident, I found a fairly inexpensive laptop that seemed to meet most of my requirements. But that’s the next post in this series  …




A Cheap “GeoPad” – Putting Together An Affordable Field-Capable GIS/GPS Workstation

Last week, I posted my feature “wish list” for a handheld GPS unit designed for advanced fieldwork by scientists, mappers, technicians, etc.. One step up from that “dream” GPS unit are the mini PDA-like GPS devices / handheld computers already on the market from companies like Trimble, Ashtech, Leica Geosystems and many others. These typically have somewhat larger display screens, usually touch-enabled, and often run Windows Mobile. These can be a good choice for field data acquisition, but also have some drawbacks:

  • The screen size is fine for data acquisition, but can be too small for actual mapping work (both viewing and creating maps)
  • Even the cheapest units will start at over $600; more expensive units can easily run into thousands of dollars
  • The software for data acquisition and mapping is limited by the OS; there’s a lot less available for Windows Mobile than for standard versions of Windows (XP/Vista/7)
  • Windows Mobile isn’t the greatest OS in the world, and development of it has been very slow
  • The software that is available is often expensive
  • Processor speeds tend to be slow
  • Input is often by stylus only, which can be slow
  • Storage space for datasets can be severely limited

One step up (or maybe sideways) from these PDA devices is the concept of a GeoPad, a field-capable full PC running a desktop operating system like Windows XP. I’ve been keeping my eye on these for a while now, as this isn’t a new concept. The University of Michigan’s GeoPad website talks about developing the concept since 2003; they define a GeoPad as:

a rugged Tablet PC equipped with wireless networking, a portable GPS receiver, digital camera, microphone-headset, voice-recognition software, GIS software, and supporting, digital, geo-referenced data-sets.

The advantages of a GeoPad over a PDA-based solution (which the GeoPad site calls a GeoPocket) include:

  • Larger screen area, better suited for mapping, and easier for multiple people to view
  • Full Windows OS, which opens access to all Windows-compatible applications
  • Greater storage space (hard drive or SSD), for more datasets
  • More input options: full keyboard, stylus, mouse/trackpad

But it has disadvantages compared to PDA-based solutions as well:

  • Larger and heavier
  • Shorter battery life
  • Less rugged

But the biggest obstacle to GeoPad adoption might be cost. The GeoPad website lists a number of hardware/software combinations, with costs of about $4000-$5000; while the models are a bit out of data (circa 2007), costs of hardware and software comparable to the ones they list indicate that prices haven’t dropped as much as they have for other computer hardware.

About six months ago, I was asked to figure out whether it might be possible to find a combination of cheap hardware, and free/inexpensive GIS/GPS software, that would let you put together a GeoPad-type system for significantly less than the $4000-$5000 range without sacrificing too much in features. Over the next few months, I’ll be writing a series of posts on how I put together a usable GeoPad system for under $700 in hardware and software costs. It’s not a perfect system;  I’ll point out where it’s deficient, and how to work around some of those deficiencies. But you’ll find some of those deficiencies on expensive systems as well. Overall, my cheap GeoPad does most of what the more expensive systems do, at less than a fifth the cost. And even if you don’t go the cheapest route, hopefully you’ll find some of my experiences useful in putting together a GeoPad system of your own.

PS If you have no interest in this topic, don’t worry; I won’t be focusing exclusively on this. Posts on standard blog topics will continue.