<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Earth Caching Programs III – Google Earth Voyager</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freegeographytools.com/2009/google-earth-caching-programs-iii-google-earth-voyager/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/google-earth-caching-programs-iii-google-earth-voyager</link>
	<description>Exploring the world of free tools for GIS, GPS, Google Earth, neogeography, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:36:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: John van Raak</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/google-earth-caching-programs-iii-google-earth-voyager/comment-page-1#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>John van Raak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=2873#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>Please note that height above the ground is NOT the same as eye height!
To give a rough idea about the area coverage:

height(m) Area(km2)
400       600
600       1400
1000      4000
2000      15000
3000      35000
4000      62000
5000      97000

Coverage also depends on your GE settings for layers and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note that height above the ground is NOT the same as eye height!<br />
To give a rough idea about the area coverage:</p>
<p>height(m) Area(km2)<br />
400       600<br />
600       1400<br />
1000      4000<br />
2000      15000<br />
3000      35000<br />
4000      62000<br />
5000      97000</p>
<p>Coverage also depends on your GE settings for layers and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John van Raak</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/google-earth-caching-programs-iii-google-earth-voyager/comment-page-1#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>John van Raak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=2873#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>I derived an empiric formula to roughly calculate the total area covered for a given height to fill the maximum GE cache of 2000 MB. This formula works well for heights between 500 and 5000 meters, probably the most used.

A = (H/16)^2

A = area covered in km2
H = height above the ground in meters</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I derived an empiric formula to roughly calculate the total area covered for a given height to fill the maximum GE cache of 2000 MB. This formula works well for heights between 500 and 5000 meters, probably the most used.</p>
<p>A = (H/16)^2</p>
<p>A = area covered in km2<br />
H = height above the ground in meters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leszek Pawlowicz</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/google-earth-caching-programs-iii-google-earth-voyager/comment-page-1#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator>Leszek Pawlowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=2873#comment-1322</guid>
		<description>No, I don&#039;t know where the GE plugin keeps its cache; sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I don&#8217;t know where the GE plugin keeps its cache; sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amb</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/google-earth-caching-programs-iii-google-earth-voyager/comment-page-1#comment-1323</link>
		<dc:creator>amb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=2873#comment-1323</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the quick reply Leszek
Do you know where the GE Plug-In cache lives?
THANXS
amb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the quick reply Leszek<br />
Do you know where the GE Plug-In cache lives?<br />
THANXS<br />
amb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leszek Pawlowicz</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/google-earth-caching-programs-iii-google-earth-voyager/comment-page-1#comment-1318</link>
		<dc:creator>Leszek Pawlowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=2873#comment-1318</guid>
		<description>The Google Earth plugin does cache data, but unfortunately it flushes the cache automatically when it closes. So none of these techniques will work with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Google Earth plugin does cache data, but unfortunately it flushes the cache automatically when it closes. So none of these techniques will work with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amb</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/google-earth-caching-programs-iii-google-earth-voyager/comment-page-1#comment-1319</link>
		<dc:creator>amb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=2873#comment-1319</guid>
		<description>Hi Leszek:
I’ve been a reader of your site for some time now and always enjoy you posts.
I found your latest series of posts on Google Earth caching particularly helpful.
Do you know if these techniques and tools would work with the GE Browser plug-in?
THANXS
amb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Leszek:<br />
I’ve been a reader of your site for some time now and always enjoy you posts.<br />
I found your latest series of posts on Google Earth caching particularly helpful.<br />
Do you know if these techniques and tools would work with the GE Browser plug-in?<br />
THANXS<br />
amb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Morrison</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/google-earth-caching-programs-iii-google-earth-voyager/comment-page-1#comment-1320</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=2873#comment-1320</guid>
		<description>Oops, please ignore my question - I just re-read your original posts and now understand that manually caching for large areas is tedious, hence the need for the programs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, please ignore my question &#8211; I just re-read your original posts and now understand that manually caching for large areas is tedious, hence the need for the programs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Morrison</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/google-earth-caching-programs-iii-google-earth-voyager/comment-page-1#comment-1321</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=2873#comment-1321</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I enjoy reading your blog - I&#039;m an archaeologist and find that a lot of your tips and tricks have a lot of relevance to my own work. I have a simple question about your posts on Google Earth caching: why bother? Is it simply to allow you to have and maintain a local cache of GE data? I can see benefits to this (especially when doing remote work where you don&#039;t have a  web connection!) but at the same time if I&quot;m heading bush I just make sure I have had a good browse around all the areas I&#039;m interested in thereby capturing it in the cache?

Or have I missed something? I&quot;m not being critical in any way, I just don&#039;t know and am wondering if there are additional benefits?! Thanks for the great site, I&#039;m glad you started it up again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I enjoy reading your blog &#8211; I&#8217;m an archaeologist and find that a lot of your tips and tricks have a lot of relevance to my own work. I have a simple question about your posts on Google Earth caching: why bother? Is it simply to allow you to have and maintain a local cache of GE data? I can see benefits to this (especially when doing remote work where you don&#8217;t have a  web connection!) but at the same time if I&#8221;m heading bush I just make sure I have had a good browse around all the areas I&#8217;m interested in thereby capturing it in the cache?</p>
<p>Or have I missed something? I&#8221;m not being critical in any way, I just don&#8217;t know and am wondering if there are additional benefits?! Thanks for the great site, I&#8217;m glad you started it up again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
