<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evaluating GPS Receiver Accuracy With VisualGPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freegeographytools.com/2009/evaluating-gps-receiver-accuracy-with-visualgps/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/evaluating-gps-receiver-accuracy-with-visualgps</link>
	<description>Exploring the world of free tools for GIS, GPS, Google Earth, neogeography, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 04:10:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Leszek Pawlowicz</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/evaluating-gps-receiver-accuracy-with-visualgps/comment-page-1#comment-1494</link>
		<dc:creator>Leszek Pawlowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=3981#comment-1494</guid>
		<description>I compared results from this Garmin unit with the antenna in both horizontal and vertical positions; no difference.

Newer 60 and 76-series Garmin units use the MTK chipset, the same maker as in the Holux M-1000 unit, so that might explain the improved performance you see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I compared results from this Garmin unit with the antenna in both horizontal and vertical positions; no difference.</p>
<p>Newer 60 and 76-series Garmin units use the MTK chipset, the same maker as in the Holux M-1000 unit, so that might explain the improved performance you see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie Connors</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/evaluating-gps-receiver-accuracy-with-visualgps/comment-page-1#comment-1493</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Connors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=3981#comment-1493</guid>
		<description>I have done similar tests with Garmin units but I always used a ceramic coffee cup to hold the unit in the upright position if it had a helical antenna.  I found that the newer 76 and 60 series Garmin units had very little drift during my tests.  I also used a benchmark that had been surveyed by GPS.  I am certain it shouldn&#039;t be difficult to find a high order benchmark in your area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have done similar tests with Garmin units but I always used a ceramic coffee cup to hold the unit in the upright position if it had a helical antenna.  I found that the newer 76 and 60 series Garmin units had very little drift during my tests.  I also used a benchmark that had been surveyed by GPS.  I am certain it shouldn&#8217;t be difficult to find a high order benchmark in your area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

