<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Review Of The Magellan Triton 2000 GPS Receiver &#8211; Part II: Out In The Field</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freegeographytools.com/2009/a-review-of-the-magellan-triton-2000-gps-receiver-part-ii-out-in-the-field/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/a-review-of-the-magellan-triton-2000-gps-receiver-part-ii-out-in-the-field</link>
	<description>Exploring the world of free tools for GIS, GPS, Google Earth, neogeography, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:36:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Leszek Pawlowicz</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/a-review-of-the-magellan-triton-2000-gps-receiver-part-ii-out-in-the-field/comment-page-1#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>Leszek Pawlowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 19:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=4024#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>The newer Garmin 60CSx models use a Mediatek chipset; there&#039;s some discussion of that here:

http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=228100

No formal comparison yet of Sirfstar 60CSx vs. Mediatek 60CSx that I&#039;ve been able to find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The newer Garmin 60CSx models use a Mediatek chipset; there&#8217;s some discussion of that here:</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=228100" rel="nofollow">http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=228100</a></p>
<p>No formal comparison yet of Sirfstar 60CSx vs. Mediatek 60CSx that I&#8217;ve been able to find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/a-review-of-the-magellan-triton-2000-gps-receiver-part-ii-out-in-the-field/comment-page-1#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 19:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=4024#comment-1516</guid>
		<description>Great set of articles. It looks like your comparison is with the original Garmin 60Cx/CSx which use the Sirf Star 3 chipset. I understand the new Garmin 60CSx uses a different chipset. I wonder how the new Garmin chipset would compare with the Sirf Star 3 chipset?

Sincerely,
Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great set of articles. It looks like your comparison is with the original Garmin 60Cx/CSx which use the Sirf Star 3 chipset. I understand the new Garmin 60CSx uses a different chipset. I wonder how the new Garmin chipset would compare with the Sirf Star 3 chipset?</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kesh</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/a-review-of-the-magellan-triton-2000-gps-receiver-part-ii-out-in-the-field/comment-page-1#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator>Kesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=4024#comment-1515</guid>
		<description>-apologies, typo above-  it should read:  &quot;I would like to...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-apologies, typo above-  it should read:  &#8220;I would like to&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kesh</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/a-review-of-the-magellan-triton-2000-gps-receiver-part-ii-out-in-the-field/comment-page-1#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>Kesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=4024#comment-1514</guid>
		<description>Thanks for both replies, appreciate them. I think I will wait until your post on the netbook is available. It would like to have one with Ozi, a GPS, GSAK, Google Earth and Mapsource!  I really (really) like TTQV, but the complete version is too expensive, so I am leaving it out of this wish list.

Any brand/model with better visibility/screen that you are aware of?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for both replies, appreciate them. I think I will wait until your post on the netbook is available. It would like to have one with Ozi, a GPS, GSAK, Google Earth and Mapsource!  I really (really) like TTQV, but the complete version is too expensive, so I am leaving it out of this wish list.</p>
<p>Any brand/model with better visibility/screen that you are aware of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leszek Pawlowicz</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/a-review-of-the-magellan-triton-2000-gps-receiver-part-ii-out-in-the-field/comment-page-1#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>Leszek Pawlowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=4024#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>Depends on your needs; if raster maps matter, a Triton would be a good choice, if not then the Garmins are probably better.

Coincidentally, I&#039;m working on a series of posts on creating a portable GIS/GPS workstation using a netbook. Visibility in full sunlight is definitely a problem, but I&#039;ve found several unusual ways to make the screen readable under those conditions, even if it&#039;s not ideal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends on your needs; if raster maps matter, a Triton would be a good choice, if not then the Garmins are probably better.</p>
<p>Coincidentally, I&#8217;m working on a series of posts on creating a portable GIS/GPS workstation using a netbook. Visibility in full sunlight is definitely a problem, but I&#8217;ve found several unusual ways to make the screen readable under those conditions, even if it&#8217;s not ideal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlove</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/a-review-of-the-magellan-triton-2000-gps-receiver-part-ii-out-in-the-field/comment-page-1#comment-1511</link>
		<dc:creator>tlove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=4024#comment-1511</guid>
		<description>sure you can run Oziexplorer on them they are PC&#039;s
but good luck seeing the screen outdoors most of them are not very daylight readable

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transreflective_liquid_crystal_display</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure you can run Oziexplorer on them they are PC&#8217;s<br />
but good luck seeing the screen outdoors most of them are not very daylight readable</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transreflective_liquid_crystal_display" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transreflective_liquid_crystal_display</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kesh</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2009/a-review-of-the-magellan-triton-2000-gps-receiver-part-ii-out-in-the-field/comment-page-1#comment-1512</link>
		<dc:creator>Kesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=4024#comment-1512</guid>
		<description>Leszek, thanks, I really enjoyed the two parts review of the Triton. Great job. I am curious about the ability to use raster maps on this receiver. You said it is a fantastic feature, so I bet it is really a good feature!  I have a 60CSx and still own an old Etrex as backup.  Do you think the Triton would fit the backup role if I retire the Etrex from service?   I am also considering using one of those new small laptops (those little laptops I see now everywhere, sorry I know little about them) but I am not sure if they are able to run a software like Fugawi, TTQV or OziExplorer. Have you tested those minilaptops?

Kind regards,
Kesh
Doha, State of Qatar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leszek, thanks, I really enjoyed the two parts review of the Triton. Great job. I am curious about the ability to use raster maps on this receiver. You said it is a fantastic feature, so I bet it is really a good feature!  I have a 60CSx and still own an old Etrex as backup.  Do you think the Triton would fit the backup role if I retire the Etrex from service?   I am also considering using one of those new small laptops (those little laptops I see now everywhere, sorry I know little about them) but I am not sure if they are able to run a software like Fugawi, TTQV or OziExplorer. Have you tested those minilaptops?</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />
Kesh<br />
Doha, State of Qatar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
