Garmin handheld GPS units use vector graphics to display imagery, so it’s generally been considered impossible to view raster imagery on them, like USGS topo maps or aerial photographs. But I’ve figured out a way, and created a program that lets you convert free USGS topo maps downloaded from the Seamless Server, black-and-white DOQQs, color satellite imagery, any georeferenced raster imagery, to a Garmin-compatible format: Moagu - the Mother Of All GPS Utilities. Rich Owings has the first review at GPS Tracklog (he likes it!).
Here’s a few screenshots from my Garmin 60Cx:
 |
 |
 |
You can download a demo version at the website. Introductory price is $19.95.
Other posts in the Garmin GPS series
- Garmin microSD Card Tricks
- Exporting Data From Garmin’s MapSource Program To Google Earth
- Free Garmin GPS Unit Auto-Routing With MetroGuide Maps + Free European Basemap
- Cheap Worldwide Road And Contour Maps For Garmin GPS Units
- Converting A Garmin USB GPS Connection To Multiple Serial NMEA Connections
- Converting OpenStreetMap Data Into GPX Or Garmin .img Format
- Adding Garmin .img Map Files To MapSource
- Sources For Free Garmin .img GPS Map Files
- Beta Version Of DNRGarmin
- Google Maps Search Interface For Garmin .img Maps
- High-Res Garmin Topo Maps For CO, WY, and UT (also Argentina, Uruguay and Chile)
- Creating Custom Waypoint Icons For Garmin GPS Units I
- Creating Custom Waypoint Icons For Garmin GPS Units II
- Creating Custom Waypoint Icons For Garmin GPS Units III - Custom Waypoint Icons In MapSource
- Garmin Handheld GPS Units That Support Custom Waypoints
- Garmin MapSource For Free
- Garmin GPS Unit Waypoint Icons Table
- A Look At OpenStreetMap’s TIGER Data Exported To A Garmin GPS
- Beating The Garmin 2025-Map Limit With US Topo Maps
- High-Res Garmin Topo Maps Now Out For Utah
- Introduction To Garmin GPS Custom POI (Points Of Interest) Data
- Garmin Topo Maps For Montana And California
- Creating A Garmin Custom POI Datafile
- Managing Custom POI Data On A Garmin Handheld GPS
- Creating Custom Icons For Garmin Points Of Interest (POI)
- Creating A Garmin GPS Points Of Interest (POI) File From A Point Shapefile
- Entering Multiple Datasets For A Single Set Of Garmin Custom POIs
- AZ Garmin Topo Maps And More From The GPS File Depot
- Updates For Two Garmin-Related Programs
- Put USGS Topographic Maps, Aerial Imagery, And Other Raster Imagery On Your Garmin Handheld GPS
- New Garmin Map Links At The GPS File Depot
- Sets Of Custom Garmin Waypoint Icons
- Converting Raster Maps To Garmin Vector Format With BMap2MP
- Updates At The GPS File Depot
It´s great, i just downloaded and tested and put the maps in a ique 3600 but is a shame does not work in all garmin units.
Really good work anyway.
Will this work with geologic maps?
This will work with any map you can put into a digital graphic format, and then “georeference”, i.e. assign geographical coordinates to every pixel location. I describe some free options in the help file, but you might also look at yesterday’s post, which describes a method to do that online.
This looks very cool Leszek!
I downloaded the Demo. But no matter what I do the program reports:
“This Worldfile is not in valid…..”
I tried maps in Bagdhad and Danmark. I reprojected the files using Global Mapper and the Utility in Moagu.
What did I miss?
I’m swapping emails with Thomas right now to track down the problem, but I believe it’s because Denmark uses “,” where the US uses “.” as the decimal point. If this is true, it will be fixed.
Edit: Yup, that was the problem. It’s now fixed.
Raul,
So you’re saying the maps work in an iQue 3600? Wow, I would not have expected that.
No I´m sorry, for my english grammar, what I want to say is I put the map but not work, only points with a tag “creted with cgpsmapp…….”.
So is good work but DON´T work in a ique
I guess your app is based on the same idea as http://mapwel.biz/
How do they compare? (Apart from the price :)
No - Moagu and MapWel use entirely different approaches. MapWel converts the image data from raster to vector, while Moagu uses the original raster data to generate its maps. There are advantages and disadvantages to both approaches:
- MapWel has a maximum color count of 16 in the current version, and a technical maximum of 60 colors (which they would implement if people wanted). Moagu can create images with up to 254 colors, the maximum allowed by the Garmin’s hardware. Edit: This is last week’s specs, including the “60 color” limit statement which came from one of MapWel’s programmers; as of this week, it now supports up to 86 colors.
- MapWel vectorizes the raster image, and requires you to prepare the image beforehand (with the limited color set) to improve the quality of that vectorization. Edit: Still true, but the latest version does do an automatic color conversion. Moagu can use the image unprepared, although you can improve the results with some image optimization.
- MapWel gets its best results with images that have a limited set of colors, and well-defined boundaries between colors. If you use those kind of images, you’ll probably get better results with MapWel than Moagu. Certainly faster displays. Edit: The latest version of MapWel is even faster for small areas at high zooms (500ft./120m), but the bigger the total area covered, the slower it gets.
- For general aerial imagery, especially color imagery with gradual color changes, Moagu’s results will usually be superior to MapWel’s. Any time you have an image with lots of small details in different colors, MapWel’s vectorization process is likely to lose some of that detail; Moagu won’t. For example, one Moagu user is converting aerial photos of coral reefs for use in a mapping project; subtle changes in water color with depth would be lost in MapWel, but are visible in Moagu. Edit: Still true, even with the greater color range of the new version. And display speeds for such imagery are comparable for both Moagu and MapWel.
- MapWel is more expensive ($45 for a version that works with a single unit, $90 for one with no limitations). But MapWel is also a full-featured Garmin vector map editor and creator, while Moagu only does one thing - converts raster imagery into Garmin maps.
Which is better? I’m not unbiased, but I’d say that for most raster imagery, Moagu will give better results than MapWel. Initial display speeds will probably be slower in Moagu maps than MapWel maps, but the display should be able to keep up with your position for walking speeds, and even bicycling speeds for some kinds of maps (maps with lots of white space in them). There are display update issues at driving speeds for maps from both programs. But if you’re primarily using maps with sharp color distinctions, and limited color palettes, MapWel might be a better choice, especially with its vector editing capability; if you want maps that cover large areas, Moagu will probably do a better job.
Here’s an article on using MapWel to make USGS topos:
http://travelbygps.com/articles/cartography.php