<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recap of &quot;Exporting Shapefiles To Google Earth&quot; Series</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freegeographytools.com/2007/recap-of-exporting-shapefiles-to-google-earth-series/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2007/recap-of-exporting-shapefiles-to-google-earth-series</link>
	<description>Exploring the world of free tools for GIS, GPS, Google Earth, neogeography, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Leszek Pawlowicz</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2007/recap-of-exporting-shapefiles-to-google-earth-series/comment-page-1#comment-4112</link>
		<dc:creator>Leszek Pawlowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=61#comment-4112</guid>
		<description>Google Earth positions can be off by anywhere from 10-30 meters in the US from the true positions; you&#039;d be better off using aerial imagery from the USGS Seamless Server, with 1-meter resolution and spot-on accuracy. You can load these images into a GIS program, then trace the buildings - there are posts on my sites about a number of GIS programs that can do this (try MapWindow to start).

Accurate field positions (within a meter) require expensive GPS receivers - consumer models won&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Earth positions can be off by anywhere from 10-30 meters in the US from the true positions; you&#8217;d be better off using aerial imagery from the USGS Seamless Server, with 1-meter resolution and spot-on accuracy. You can load these images into a GIS program, then trace the buildings &#8211; there are posts on my sites about a number of GIS programs that can do this (try MapWindow to start).</p>
<p>Accurate field positions (within a meter) require expensive GPS receivers &#8211; consumer models won&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Erhart</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2007/recap-of-exporting-shapefiles-to-google-earth-series/comment-page-1#comment-4093</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Erhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=61#comment-4093</guid>
		<description>I 3D model in a program called Google SketchUp, which uses information imported from Google Earth to model buildings. I would like to be able to capture the view from GE set points for the footprint of a building from that view, or add those points from field locations,(which is something else I would like to ask about, like how to simply do that.)and be able to create shapefiles from that information. Modeling from shapefiles is very accurate, and it updates current GIS information which is a benefit to our city.

Could you give me steps on how this could be accomplished? I see bits and pieces of this being answered through your posted articles, but I would like more directed way to accomplishing this.

Sure would appreciate your input.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I 3D model in a program called Google SketchUp, which uses information imported from Google Earth to model buildings. I would like to be able to capture the view from GE set points for the footprint of a building from that view, or add those points from field locations,(which is something else I would like to ask about, like how to simply do that.)and be able to create shapefiles from that information. Modeling from shapefiles is very accurate, and it updates current GIS information which is a benefit to our city.</p>
<p>Could you give me steps on how this could be accomplished? I see bits and pieces of this being answered through your posted articles, but I would like more directed way to accomplishing this.</p>
<p>Sure would appreciate your input.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan heyman</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2007/recap-of-exporting-shapefiles-to-google-earth-series/comment-page-1#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan heyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=61#comment-224</guid>
		<description>ESRI is limited in exporting attributes from what i&#039;ve found.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESRI is limited in exporting attributes from what i&#8217;ve found.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nico</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2007/recap-of-exporting-shapefiles-to-google-earth-series/comment-page-1#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 17:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/?p=61#comment-222</guid>
		<description>ArcGIS 9.2 with 3D analyst can export directly to KML.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In the toolbox go to&lt;br/&gt;3D Analyst Tools &gt; Conversion &gt; To KML -&gt; Layer to KML&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;To go from KML to Shapefile use the GPS Utility&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.gpsu.co.uk/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ArcGIS 9.2 with 3D analyst can export directly to KML.</p>
<p>In the toolbox go to<br />3D Analyst Tools > Conversion > To KML -> Layer to KML</p>
<p>To go from KML to Shapefile use the GPS Utility</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gpsu.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gpsu.co.uk/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

