<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limited KML Support In Microsoft&#039;s Virtual Earth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freegeographytools.com/2007/limited-kml-support-in-microsofts-virtual-earth/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2007/limited-kml-support-in-microsofts-virtual-earth</link>
	<description>Exploring the world of free tools for GIS, GPS, Google Earth, neogeography, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:05:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Leszek Pawlowicz</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2007/limited-kml-support-in-microsofts-virtual-earth/comment-page-1#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>Leszek Pawlowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/2007/limited-kml-support-in-microsofts-virtual-earth#comment-821</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t work with Virtual Earth that much, so I can&#039;t help you too much with the MS Live Collections problem.

I understand your argument - I also had a client who really wanted the application to be browser-based. For me, the advantages of an independent client are clear.

Sorry about the reCaptcha - I don&#039;t actually select the words. Thing is, it cut my comment spam from 50 a day down to 1-2 a day. And by helping to digitize books, it actually serves a useful purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t work with Virtual Earth that much, so I can&#8217;t help you too much with the MS Live Collections problem.</p>
<p>I understand your argument &#8211; I also had a client who really wanted the application to be browser-based. For me, the advantages of an independent client are clear.</p>
<p>Sorry about the reCaptcha &#8211; I don&#8217;t actually select the words. Thing is, it cut my comment spam from 50 a day down to 1-2 a day. And by helping to digitize books, it actually serves a useful purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Jackson</title>
		<link>http://freegeographytools.com/2007/limited-kml-support-in-microsofts-virtual-earth/comment-page-1#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freegeographytools.com/2007/limited-kml-support-in-microsofts-virtual-earth#comment-820</guid>
		<description>I was wondering if you or any of the readers have found a way to translate MS Live Collections (polygons) to KML?  Ideally, I need to get someones Collection into ArcGIS (shp), so getting it to KML will do fine.

I do agree with a lot of what you say, firefox seems to have trouble installing the 3d plug-in so im not a big fan at the moment.  But if I want to distribute a kml to a client, instead of them having to download google earth as a separate application, it would be quite handy having it all in a browser (albeitthey still have to install plugins).  I find in the commmercial environment a lot of IT departments are beginning to block programmes like Google Earth due to bandwidth and problems with profiles/My Places in google earth.
(by the way your ReCaptcha is a bit extreme, maybe find a simpler one? I just had to type an obscure 17 character pair of words)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if you or any of the readers have found a way to translate MS Live Collections (polygons) to KML?  Ideally, I need to get someones Collection into ArcGIS (shp), so getting it to KML will do fine.</p>
<p>I do agree with a lot of what you say, firefox seems to have trouble installing the 3d plug-in so im not a big fan at the moment.  But if I want to distribute a kml to a client, instead of them having to download google earth as a separate application, it would be quite handy having it all in a browser (albeitthey still have to install plugins).  I find in the commmercial environment a lot of IT departments are beginning to block programmes like Google Earth due to bandwidth and problems with profiles/My Places in google earth.<br />
(by the way your ReCaptcha is a bit extreme, maybe find a simpler one? I just had to type an obscure 17 character pair of words)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
